|
KMID : 0608320150220030050
|
|
Physical Therapy Korea
2015 Volume.22 No. 3 p.50 ~ p.60
|
|
|
Comparison of Immediate Effects of Pain, Range of Motion and Treatment Satisfaction on Difference of Applying Joint Mobilization Levels in Patients With Acute Mechanical Neck Pain
|
|
Lee Nam-Yong
Kim Suhn-Yeop
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
The purpose of this study was to apply the joint mobilization technique to the level of segments with pain and to the level of segments with hypomobility respectively and compare the immediate effects of the joint mobilization technique on the pain, the active cervical range of motion (ROM), and treatment satisfaction of patients with acute mechanical neck pain. After the baseline assessment, forty-two patients were randomized into two groups: a painful group (n1=21) that received joint mobilization at the most painful cervical spine level and a hypomobile group (n2=21) that received joint mobilization at the most hypomobile cervical level. The patients received an intervention that applied unilateral posterior-anterior gliding for 5 minutes and two repetitions of 10 times of active extension motion with distraction. In the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, the painful group and the hypomobile group were improved significantly in all pain variables (p<.001), while the painful group was improved significantly in the active cervical flexion (p<.001), extension (p<.001), left side-bending (p<.01), right side-bending (p=.001), left rotation (p<.001), and right rotation (p<.001). The hypomobile group was significantly improved in active cervical flexion (p=.001), extension (p<.001), left side-bending (p<.05), right side-bending (p=.001), left rotation (p=.001), and right rotation (p<.01) after intervention. In the Mann-Whitney U test, there was no significant difference in any of the dependent variables after the intervention between the two groups, but the painful group was slightly superior to the hypomobile group in all variables except for the right lateral flexion ROM and treatment satisfaction. These outcomes suggest that the cervical joint mobilization may be applied to either the level of painful segments or the hypomobile segments for the treatment of patients with acute mechanical neck pain.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Joint mobilization, Mechanical neck pain, Range of motion
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|